Every attorney must hold a professional law license issued by a state as a condition to practicing law in that state. Revocation of an attorney's license is known as “disbarment.” The rules that govern licensing and disbarment of attorneys vary from state to state. However, most states have adopted the Model Rules of Professional Conduct that the American Bar Association has established, as well as provisions that are in accord with the ABA’s guide to bar admissions. All states hold attorneys to high levels of character and fitness. A majority of states publish character and fitness standards, which consider factors such as unlawful conduct, acts involving dishonesty, neglect of financial and professional responsibilities, violations of court orders, mental or emotional instability, and drug or alcohol abuse.
Bar Admission Requirements
For further clarification of the character and fitness required for the practice of law, the ABA Code of Recommended Standards for Bar Examiners provides: “A lawyer should be one whose record of conduct justifies the trust of clients, adversaries, courts, and others with respect to the professional duties owed to them. A record manifesting a significant deficiency in honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, or reliability of an applicant may constitute a basis for denial of admission.” In addition, in listing the factors that are deemed relevant to the question of whether an applicant is fit to practice law, “neglect of financial responsibilities” is specified. Again, if the circumstances of an attorney’s filing for bankruptcy include evidence that the attorney is untrustworthy or unreliable, disbarment may result.
ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
Rule 8.4 of the ABA Model Rules provides that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: “(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation,” factors that bear on an attorney’s character and fitness to practice law. If the circumstances of an attorney’s filing for bankruptcy include such factors, disbarment may result, despite Section 525(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. Although filing for bankruptcy is not alone cause for disbarment of an attorney, it may contribute along with other factors to a finding that the attorney lacks sufficient trustworthiness and reliability to practice law. Thus, in a case where the attorney failed to honor commitments made in a debt-management plan that was entered as an express condition of the granting of a two-year probationary law license, the reviewing court found sufficient cause to support his disbarment. In another case, an applicant was found to lack the requisite “good moral character and general fitness to practice law” in light of “past alcohol and drug use” and “personal financial dealings.”
Filing for Bankruptcy
The U.S. Bankruptcy Code expressly prohibits the denial, revocation or suspension of a professional license solely because the licensee has filed for relief under the Bankruptcy Act, so that the act of filing for bankruptcy is not sufficient to warrant disbarment of an attorney. Attorneys are not immune to the same factors that cause bankruptcies among other classes of licensed professionals. The majority of attorneys who file bankruptcy retain their licenses. There is less uniformity among the various states as to whether attorneys must report their filing for bankruptcy. Some states require an attorney to report the act of filing for bankruptcy to the state bar association of disciplinary authority, while others do not.
Appeal and Reinstatement
Although the rules vary from state to state, every state has provisions for further review or appeal of an order of disbarment, as well as for conditions of reinstatement. Therefore, the initial order of disbarment is not the final word on the subject and, if an order of disbarment is upheld on appeal, the license to practice law may be subsequently reinstated after statutory waiting periods and conditions have been met.
- United States Bankruptcy Code: Section 525(a)
- American Bar Association: Model Rules of Professional Conduct
- American Bar Association: Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2011; page vii
- Texas Court of Appeals; Third District: Santulli v. Texas Board of Law Examiners
- Supreme Court of Oregon: In the Matter of the Application for Reinstatement of Bruce A. Gunter
- The Development of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedures in the United States; Mary M. Devlin
John Parker is the long-standing editor of an internationally distributed technology magazine. Since 1975, his wide-ranging writing career has encompassed diverse projects spanning from legal boilerplate to editorials to technology tutorials. Parker holds a Doctor of Jurisprudence.