Many children born during a marriage are the biological children of the husband and wife, but this isn’t always true. On the other hand, it would be disruptive to family life if children born to a husband and wife weren’t presumed to be their biological children. Consequently, North Carolina has laws that presume a husband is the father of his wife’s children. During a divorce, this can give the father rights to custody and visitation and may require him to pay child support.
Presumption During Marriage
In North Carolina, a child conceived or born while his mother is married is presumed to be the child of the mother’s husband. In a legal context, this is called a rebuttable presumption, which means that the presumption will stand unless there is “clear and convincing” evidence to the contrary. When contrary evidence is presented, the court may decide whether the mother’s husband is actually the child’s biological father.
Presumption Before Marriage
North Carolina law also establishes a presumption of paternity for children born outside of wedlock but whose parents later marry. If a man and the child’s mother consider themselves to be the child’s biological parents, the man is called a “reputed” father. When a reputed father and the child’s mother marry after the child’s birth, the reputed father is presumed by North Carolina law to be the child’s biological father. Like the presumption regarding children born during a marriage, this presumption is rebuttable by evidence that the reputed father is not, in fact, the child’s father.
Since both presumptions of paternity, whether the child is born during or before marriage, are rebuttable, the child’s presumed father has the ability to provide evidence to prove that he is not the biological father. For example, if evidence is presented that casts doubt about whether the husband is the father, such as testimony that the mother was separated from the father and living with another man at the time the child was conceived, this evidence could rebut the fatherhood presumption. Consequently, fatherhood may need to be established through other means, such as a paternity test, which is permitted by North Carolina Statute 8-50.1 in cases where paternity is in question.
In some cases, the child’s presumed father may not be the one disputing the presumption. Instead, it may be another man with whom the mother had a sexual relationship during the time the child was conceived. North Carolina Statute 49-12.1 allows a man who has evidence that he may be the father of a child who already has a presumed father to bring a lawsuit to establish paternity by rebutting the fatherhood presumption. However, the man does not have the ability to force genetic testing of the child and his presumed father.
Custody, Visitation and Child Support
As long as a husband’s paternity has not been disproved, he is considered to be the child’s father and has rights to establish custody and visitation during a divorce case. He will also be responsible to pay child support unless he disproves paternity. In child custody determinations, North Carolina does not allow a child’s mother to claim that her former husband is not the father of a child born while they were married unless another man has been found to be the child’s biological father or has formally acknowledged that he is the child’s father.
- North Carolina General Assembly: North Carolina General Statutes: Chapter 49
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Family Law Bulletin: Who’s Your Daddy? Comparing North Carolina’s Paternity Law and the Uniform Parentage Act; John L. Saxon
- North Carolina General Assembly: North Carolina General Statutes: 8-50.1
- North Carolina Court of Appeals: Sharn M. Jeffries v. Tatjana Thomas Moore and Carl Thomas Moore, Jr.
- University of North Carolina School of Government: Genetic Testing to Determine Paternity
- Jupiterimages/Brand X Pictures/Getty Images